Yesterday, there was a guy in a car behind me reading a book. We were both going at least 60 mph. I'm not talking about glancing quickly at a set of directions. I'm talking about a full-on paperback novel of some sort. He should die. Alone, of course.
Today, there were three different car accidents that caused traffic jams on the way to work. There was another broken down car, but on 580, people seem to be smarter and less inclined to rubberneck than on 880.
Posted by kstroke at September 24, 2004 10:54 AMNothing happens to any man that he is not formed by nature to bear. by party poker
Posted by: poker rooms at November 23, 2004 08:32 AMAgainst the disease of writing one must take special precautions, since it is a dangerous and contagious disease. by partypoker
Posted by: poker tournaments at November 23, 2004 07:38 AMIt is absurd to hold that a man ought to be ashamed of being unable to defend himself with his limbs, but not of being unable to defend himself with speech and reason (logos), when the use of rational speech is more distinctive of a human being than the use of his limbs. by texas holdem poker
Posted by: free online poker at November 23, 2004 07:28 AMIt is a little embarrassing that, after 45 years of research and study, the best advice I can give to people is to be a little kinder to each other. by free online poker
Posted by: free poker online at November 23, 2004 06:28 AMAnd for mathematical science, he that doubts their certainty hath need of a dose of hellebore. by party poker
Posted by: texas holdem at November 23, 2004 05:30 AMLove, friendship, respect do not unite people as much as common hatred for something. by poker games
Posted by: poker chips at November 23, 2004 03:47 AMIt is thus clear that, just as some are by nature free, others are by nature slaves, and for these latter the condition of slavery is both beneficial and just. by texas hold'em poker
Posted by: poker at November 23, 2004 02:53 AMThe issues with respect to both relativism and the importance of sociological influences on science might be encapsulated by asking if one could have had a different science if historical conditions had differed... To the relativists the answer must presumably be 'yes', but then the onus is on them to demonstrate the validity of their position. To me, the answer is an unequivocal 'no': the course of science would have been very different, but the ideas would have ended up the same. by casino games
Posted by: roulette at November 23, 2004 01:49 AMChristianity taught that men ought to be as chaste as pagans thought honest women ought to be; the contraceptive morality teaches that women need to be as little chaste as pagans thought men need be. by world series of poker
Posted by: poker stars at November 23, 2004 12:53 AMDistrust everyone in whom the impulse to punish is powerful! by online casino
Posted by: free online casino at November 22, 2004 11:48 PMTalk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. by free online casino
Posted by: online gambling at November 22, 2004 10:39 PMEven if a civil society were to dissolve itself by the vote of all its members... nevertheless, before they go, the last murderer in prison must be executed. by free casino games
Posted by: free online casino at November 22, 2004 09:32 PMIn the matters we propose to investiage, our inquiries should be directed, not to what others have thought, nor to what we ourselves conjecture, but to what we can clearly and distinctly see and with certainty deduce, for knowledge is not won in any other way. by online roulette
Posted by: free casino games at November 22, 2004 08:28 PMReading a book while driving at 60 MPH? What an idiot. I wonder what offense that would go under if a cop saw that and pulled him over.
Posted by: kuoj at September 24, 2004 01:47 PM