We're supposed to be the most industrialized nation in the world and yet we can't seem to supply our soldiers with essential equipment. What the hell is that? And the reservists get second-rate equipment? Isn't the defense budget really huge now? Is all that money allocated towards the Star Wars program and pay raises? Not that pay raises are bad (Stars Wars sure is), but a couple of extra bucks in the pocket probably don't stop bullets nearly as well as an armor vest... The Star Wars technology sure isn't going to zap those bullets.
"Uh, we made an error in judgement with this whole liberation thing. It turns out that they don't really like us over here. Oh, and by the way, we don't have our supply chain set up correctly so you'll have to have your family buy your armor and mail it over.
And for you reservist volunteers who aren't career military people, thanks for leaving your much higher-paying jobs to help out. You're going to be out here a lot longer than we said you would be. Hopefully, you'll still have a job when you get back. We don't have any armor for you either. And you'll have to make due with these muskets. Good luck, soldier."
Posted by kstroke at March 26, 2004 11:43 AMPaley's argument is made with passionate sincerity and is informed by the best biological scholarship of his day, but it is wrong, gloriously and utterly wrong. by texas holdem poker
Posted by: poker rooms at November 23, 2004 09:10 AMSocrates said he was not an Athenian or a Greek, but a citizen of the world. by pacific poker
Posted by: online poker rooms at November 23, 2004 08:10 AMLove, friendship, respect do not unite people as much as common hatred for something. by party poker
Posted by: poker stars at November 23, 2004 07:15 AMThere is...only a single categorical imperative and it is this: Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law by free poker online
Posted by: poker chips at November 23, 2004 06:16 AMI cannot conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures, or has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves. Neither can I nor would I want to conceive of an individual that survives his physical death; let feeble souls, from fear or absurd egoism, cherish such thoughts. I am satisfied with the mystery of the eternity of life and with the awareness and a glimpse of the marvelous structure of the existing world, together with the devoted striving to comprehend a portion, be it ever so tiny, of the Reason that manifests itself in nature. by party poker
Posted by: poker tables at November 23, 2004 06:10 AMIs it honest for me to go and sit there on communion day and drink the wine and eat the bread while feeling it all to be mummery? by paradise poker
Posted by: world poker tour at November 23, 2004 05:16 AMThe issues with respect to both relativism and the importance of sociological influences on science might be encapsulated by asking if one could have had a different science if historical conditions had differed... To the relativists the answer must presumably be 'yes', but then the onus is on them to demonstrate the validity of their position. To me, the answer is an unequivocal 'no': the course of science would have been very different, but the ideas would have ended up the same. by poker tips
Posted by: poker supplies at November 23, 2004 03:29 AMThe philosophic thesis that all knowledge is ultimately founded in experience has in the end led to a postulate concerning the logical clarification of any statement about nature. Such a postulate may have seemed justified in the period of classical physics, but since quantum theory we have learned that it cannot be fulfilled. by empirepoker
Posted by: online poker sites at November 23, 2004 02:32 AMAm I to believe in every absurdity? If not, why this one in particular? by free casino games
Posted by: online blackjack at November 23, 2004 01:32 AMIf my interlocutor desires to convince me that Jupiter has inhabitants, and that his description of them is accurate, it is for him to bring forward evidence in support of his contention. The burden of proof evidently lies on him; it is not for me to prove that no such beings exist before my non-belief is justified, but for him to prove that they do exist before my belief can be fairly claimed. Similarly, it is for the affirmer of God's existence to bring evidence in support of his affirmation; the burden of proof lies on him. by WPT
Posted by: internet poker at November 23, 2004 12:31 AMThe idea of death, the fear of it, haunts the human animal like nothing else; it is a mainspring of human activity - designed largely to avoid the fatality of death, to overcome it by denying in some way that it is the final destiny of man. by casino games
Posted by: gambling at November 22, 2004 11:27 PMHow it is that anything so remarkable as a state of consciousness comes about as a result of irritating nervous tissue, is just as unnaccountable as the appearance of the Djinn when Aladdin rubbed his lamp, or any other ultimate fact of nature. by casino online
Posted by: online blackjack at November 22, 2004 10:20 PMA common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. by casino online
Posted by: blackjack at November 22, 2004 09:15 PMMany people are afraid of freedom. They are conditioned to be afraid of it. by internet casino
Posted by: online casino games at November 22, 2004 08:03 PMyour page is inspirational
Posted by: bestiality museum at August 6, 2004 05:04 PMNice site! Well done !
Posted by: gay porn reality at August 6, 2004 09:19 AMI would like to let you know we have just visited your website. Very nice site.
Posted by: rough rape at August 2, 2004 04:40 PM